Since evolution can’t explain everything, does that mean it is wrong?
Most of the scientists who sign these kinds of lists do not work in the earth or life sciences. Most are engineers, mathematicians, philosophers and so forth. Their knowledge about evolution is probably little better than the man on the street. It’s not as important as to who is saying something, but why they are saying it. Most of the people who sign these lists do so for religious, not scientific reasons. Being skeptical of evolution is fine, as long the person has evidence to back up their claims.
Evolutionary theory does not claim to explain everything. Evolution deals with how organisms change over time. It does not deal with the beginning of life, the beginning of the universe, and a myriad of other scientific fields. Evolution deals with biology, not physics, geology, cosmology, astronomy, etc. These fields often overlap and information that is pertinent to one field is often useful to another. Anti evolutionists often call any field of science or history that disagrees with their view of the world evolution, when in reality they are talking about something that has nothing to do with evolution. Sure there are plenty of unanswered questions about evolution, but more and more are being answered all the time.
For more information, please visit our Resources section.
Evolution Questions:
Common Misconceptions About Evolution
- Can biology be taught without evolution?
- I heard there are hundreds of scientists against evolution. Is this true?
- Isn’t evolution just a theory?
- Scientists are human, and humans make mistakes. How can we trust their conclusions?
- Since evolution can’t explain everything, does that mean it is wrong?
- Since so many people believe in creationism, shouldn’t it be taught as well just to be fair?
- There are only two explanations, creationism or evolution.
Common Creationist Claims
- Creationists say that there is no evidence for evolution and that all the evidence points to creationism. Is this true?
- Did a global flood deposit all the fossils?
- Did Darwin recant on his deathbed?
- Do you want to be descended from a monkey?
- Does evolution violate the second law of thermodynamics?
- Does the entire geologic column exist?
- Has speciation ever been observed?
- How many scientists are actually creationists?
- I have heard people claim that evolution is the cause of all our social problems. Communism, Nazism, racism, lust, greed, hate, all are caused by the teaching of evolution. Is this true?
- I have heard that there are no transitional fossils. Or alternatively, that there are not enough transitional fossils. Is this true?
- I’ve heard that crime rates have gone up since the teaching of evolution began. Surely there must be a correlation?
- If evolution is true, does that mean that there are no morals?
- If humans are descended from apes, why are there still apes around?
- Is Carbon 14 dating accurate?
- Is Creationism scientific?
- Is it possible for evolution to create the diversity of life? I don’t see how it could have happened. Surely it had to have had a creator?
- Is it true that human and dinosaur tracks have been found together at Paluxy River, Texas?
- Is the earth only 6,000 years old?
- Isn’t evolution just another religion?
- Micro evolution occurs, but macro evolution does not. Is this true?
- Piltdown man was a hoax, what does that mean for evolution?
- The Cambrian Explosion shows new creatures appearing suddenly, with no ancestors. There are no Precambrian fossils. How could this occur?
- Were many famous scientists creationists? Newton and Pasteur were creationists.
- Were you there when evolution happened?
- What is Creationism?
Intelligent Design
- As we see design in nature, surely there must be a designer?
- Does Intelligent Design have explanatory power?
- Intelligent Design does not name a designer. Surely it could have been caused be an advanced alien civilization instead of a supernatural entity?
- Is the universe fine tuned for life?
- Some people claim that intelligent design is not creationism and that it is something entirely new. Is this correct?
- Surely Intelligent Design is not religious, but scientific in nature?
- Surely some things are too complex to evolve. Isn’t it true that the human eye and bacteria flagellum are examples of irreducible complexity?